by IanPJ, PJC Journal, May 15, 2009
Published here: Monday May 18, 2009 at 5:07 PM
Whilst the country’s attention is firmly focused on the greed and self destruction of our Parliamentary system, the Globalist One World Government proponents have finally broken cover and come out into the open.
An NGO called Vote World Government has released the names of 45 authors who have published books or articles on the issue of globalizing democracy and who have agreed to set aside their philosophical differences in order to encourage the holding of a global referendum on the general goal of democratic world government. (Heck, we didnt even get that for the EU).
They must be feeling pretty confident that they are on to a winner, the people have been softened up enough and sucked into believing all of the panic stories of globalised debt, globalised terror, globalised AGW, globalised deseases, therefore global solutions must really be the only way forward to deal with it.
This subject for so long has been derided as mere conspiracy, to casually mention that the formation of Global Regional Governments such as the EU was always the precursor to Global Government would see you ostracised and called a Tin Foil extremist.
Well here they are folks, do you want to vote for the UN to be your Global government?
Doesn’t mean that you would ever get the chance to vote for who sits in the UN, in the same way you dont get to vote about whether you want to be in the EU, or to vote for the EU lawmakers. (note: EU Parliament is not a lawmaking body, it merely approves what is put before it).
Thats what they call the post democratic age, incorporating ‘Modern Liberty’, and there are those who are working towards this end of global government, whether you want it or not.
The fact that George (Moonbat) Monbiot is one of those proponents is enough for me to say, no chance. Same goes for the EU.
WEBWIRE
13.05.2009
Forty-five authors call for a global referendum on democratic world government
May 13, 2009, Shawville, Québec, Canada — An NGO called Vote World Government has released the names of 45 authors who have published books or articles on the issue of globalizing democracy and who have agreed to set aside their philosophical differences in order to encourage the holding of a global referendum on the general goal of democratic world government. (The list of authors is below.)
“If half of all human adults vote, and the referendum question is supported by 67% of all voters, such a global mandate will be accepted in many quarters as legally binding under international law, and it would be politically compelling no matter what its legal status,” says Canadian Jim Stark, president of VWG and author of Rescue Plan for Planet Earth: Democratic World Government through a Global Referendum.
“We are confident the human race is ready for this, even if many national governments may not be,” explains Ted Stalets, vice-president of VWG (in Nashville, TN, USA). “We resolve all of our disputes through law and democratic governance at the municipal, state (provincial) and national levels, and as Harry Truman said in 1945, there isn’t a reason in the world why we can’t do that internationally.” Stalets points to a 2004 GlobeScan poll done in 18 nations, where about 75% of those who expressed opinions indicated that they wanted a “directly-elected UN parliament.”
The plan is to pass a resolution (www.voteworldgovernment.org/draftUNresolution.pdf) through the UN calling on every nation to hold a national referendum in conjunction with its next national election, using a common ballot question: “Do you support the creation of a directly-elected, representative and democratic world government?” In the period of time before the UN General Assembly agrees to consider this draft resolution, support is being built by means of Internet voting at www.voteworldgovernment.org.
The participating authors have co-signed a letter that is being sent to thousands of NGOs, asking them to encourage their directors, staff, served communities and supporters to vote online, to generate momentum. “We have to make the online referendum go viral,” says Stark, “and we can do that best with the help of the two million NGOs in the world, who know that the work they do for humanity at large is desperately needed and underfunded primarily because the human race has so far failed to govern itself globally.”
“Even a very successful global referendum will not result in the immediate creation of a democratic world government,” says Irish citizen Brian Coughlan, Liaison Officer for VWG, “but it certainly will compel the convening of a framing conference where all of the stakeholders (national governments, NGOs, corporations, unions, religions, scholars, etc.) will have to sort through the issues and compose a world constitution.”
“This global referendum initiative has world-changing potential, and deserves the benefit of the doubt,” says Swedish professor Torbjörn Tännsjö, the author of GlobalDemocracy: The Case for a World Government.
The 45 participants in the Authors’ Campaign for Democratic World Government as of May 13, 2009 (in alphabetical order by surname)
Daniele Archibugi – The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy
Mary-Wynne Ashford – Enough Blood Shed: 101 Solutions to Violence, Terror and War
John Avery – “Against the Institution of War” (article)
Joseph Preston Baratta – The Politics of World Federation, Vol. 1, United Nations, U.N. Reform, Atomic Control; Vol. 2, From World Federalism to Global Governance
Benjamin Barber – Fear’s Empire: War, Terrorism and Democracy in an Age of Interdependence
Frank Barnaby (ed.) – The Gaia Peace Atlas
Byron Belitsos (with Jerry Tetalman) – One World Democracy: A Progressive Vision for Enforceable Global Law
James Bohman – Democracy Across Borders
Gillian Brock – Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account
Robin Cohen (with Steven Vertovec) (ed.s) – Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context, and Practice
Jack Donnelly – Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice
Nigel Dower – An Introduction to Global Citizenship
Giulio M. Gallarotti – The Power Curse: Influence and Illusion in World Politics
Chahine Ghais – “Globalism and Localism: Changing our Political Understanding of Sovereignty and Democracy” (article)
Jamshid Gharajedaghi (with Russell L. Ackoff) – “Designing a Replacement for the UN” (article)
Ronald J. Glossop – Confronting War: An Examination of Humanity’s Most Pressing Problem
U.S. Senator (1969-1981) Mike Gravel – Citizen Power: A Mandate for Change
Thomas N. Hale (co-author) – “A covenant to make global governance work” (article)
Christopher Hamer – A Global Parliament: Principles of World Federation
David Held – Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus
Fernando Iglesias – Globalizar la Democracia: Por un Parlamento Mundial (Globalizing Democracy: Appeal for a World Parliament)
Sohail Inayatullah – Understanding Sarkar: The Indian Episteme, Macrohistory and Transformative Knowledge
Margaret C. Jacob – Strangers Nowhere in the World: The Rise of Cosmopolitanism in Early Modern Europe
Didier Jacobs – Global Democracy: The Struggle for Political and Civil Rights in the 21st Century
Demetrius Klitou – “The Friends and Foes of Human Rights” (article)
William Knoke – Bold New World: The Essential Road Map to the Twenty-First Century
Finn Laursen – “Federalist Theory and World Order” (article)
Matthias Lutz-Bachmann (with James Bohman) (ed.s) – Perpetual Peace: Essays on Kant’s Cosmopolitan Ideal
Dada Maheshvarananda – After Capitalism: Prout’s Vision for a New World
Glen T. Martin – Ascent to Freedom: Practical and Philosophical Foundations of Democratic World Law
Saul Mendlovitz (ed.) – On the Creation of a Just World Order: Preferred Worlds for the 1990s
George Monbiot – The Age of Consent: A Manifesto for a New World Order
Tim Murithi – “Rethinking the United Nations System: Prospects for a World Federation of Nations” (article)
Darren O’Byrne – The Dimensions of Global Citizenship: Political Identity Beyond the Nation-State
Heikki Patomäki (with Teivo Teivainen) – A Possible World: Democratic Transformation of Global Institutions
Craig E. Runde – (Chapter 7 in Transcending Boundaries, entitled) “Beyond Nationalism”
Jim Stark – Rescue Plan for Planet Earth: Democratic World Government through a Global Referendum
John Stewart – Evolution’s Arrow: The Direction of Evolution and the Future of Humanity
Torbjörn Tännsjö – Global Democracy: The Case for a World Government
Peter J. Taylor – World City Network: a Global Urban Analysis
Teivo Teivainen (with Heikki Patomäki) – A Possible World: Dmocratic Transformation of Global Institutions
Jerry Tetalman (with Byron Belitsos) – One World Democracy: A Progressive Vision for Enforceable Global Law
Frank Vibert – “The new cosmopolitanism” (article)
Thomas G. Weiss – What’s Wrong with the United Nations and How to Fix It
James A. Yunker – Political Globalization: A New Vision of Federal World Government
They think they have won, I have a friend who thinks this. My question to him is and all ways was, “Ok, as you can identify the bad guys, could you please identify the good guys?”. According to him there arn’t any. In other words, to quote Private Frazer, “We’re doomed I tell ye, dooomed”.
The close of this age is upon us. The old order is collapsing and yes there will be a new order but not the one mentioned in the above posts. When I say “New” I mean “New” (Not a world order that that has any association with the old).
I am thinking the transition will be in three stages. The first kicked in at the autumnal equinox of 2008. The second is to Kick in at the autumnal equinox of this year. The third and final stage? Well, we must keep our eyes open for this.
See my own blog for a summary of my “Countdown to Aquarius”/”It’s about time”.
Thank you
Peakman
http://peakman.wordpress.com/
what makes any of the occult or world order topics or agendas( all of which are connected) palatable or even considerable is that they are co-mingled with everyday topics of life mundane. that co-mingling is what allows their authors to feed it to the masses slowly but surely, like the frog in the pot. the water starts out cold so there is no discomfort to the frog hence no urgency on it’s part to act even though the evidence is all around him. slowly the heat is turned up and the frog is eventually cooked to death without realising it. as unwilling participants, at this point, we know that we are the frogs in the pot. the question is how do we get out? well, we can, at least keep the flame down low by doing what we do here which is continue to let know those who would turn the heat up that we are aware of there treachery and we are spreading the word. we’ve probably all heard the adage, “ignorance is bliss”. nonsense! that’s their motto not ours. it works for them , not us. knowledge is the key to getting out of the pot! for those of us who have the understanding it’s our obligation as fellow “adult humans”, as they refer to us as, to get that info out to everyone else with an open ear. we can do what we are doing. help our fellow “frogs” out of the pot by overcoming their “externally imposed blissfull ignorance” which is allowing the fire to get hotter.
You knew I had to bite on this one.
Life outside of the pot is really no different than life on the inside of it, in simple terms, we leave the body when it is all said and done. I am willing to bet that all of us, me especially, have avoided the annoying people who tell us which way is up and what to do about it and how to go about doing it. They just suck the fun out of everything. Hell, if I am destined to “burn up” in this pot at least let me blow bubbles and float on my inflatable alligator.
Likewise….if I am on the outside of this pot and find myself all alone I still should realize the significance of being alone. I have planted many seeds and been on the recieving end of many dispariging comments because of this boiling pot, but I refuse to stop smiling simply because the other frogs could not comprehend my desire to GET OUT of it.
I enjoy this internet thingy because it reminds me that there are more thinking frogs out there and that maybe more will be coming. Besides, during my sojourn in this third density of a boiling pot, it seems that getting out is one in the same as being in it.
Kinda reminds me of one of my favorite lines from the Matrix Movies—–”There is no pot.”
Oh my Gosh, Jeffrey, Frog, True Pat,Ian, Rose, Joseph,etc.. The claSS of 2009. I think we are looking good. When Wes comes back, he won’t recognize how smart we have become, once he straightened us up, and gave us time to absorb each and every opinion tossed out there, without having the “divide and conquer” chemical in us surface.
Oh I’m getting wordy. Gotta keep it simple. Bye.
i knew you would as you know i will! the difference is awareness, lonefrog. if you are aware then you can strive to make improvements for yourself and others and avoid that so-called destiny of being cooked. those unaware will not. any difference inspired will be “given” to them making it false inspiration and in that sense you are right, there is no real difference. just as is implied in the matrix, when decisions pertaining to you are left to someone else you give up any say in matters. you are effectively “controlled”. of course, also as in the movie, you can “choose” to knowingly remain within the matrix and be content with the materialistic life given you. if you wish, but if you believe in god, the soul and the afterlife, then by simply sitting in the pot and waiting it out as long as your daily fixes are met, you truly risk not reaping the rewards of the afterlife we all seem to be looking towards. i have as of yet come across any religious or spiritual teachings that say it’s o.k. to simply ride out the mundane life while expecting to aquire a greater spiritual afterlife. it’s just not done that way. we reap what we sow. although, if anyone knows of such a religion or spiritual path please, let me know about it so i can check it out. the easier the better, right! then again, maybe all that religious spirituality stuff is of no real consequence once we’re dead. guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
Jeffrey, “Nisargadatta” will clarify it all. He is really a clear THINKER.
You asked!!!!
You know, what you said about riding it out if you are aware does seem to be neglectful. To yourself and others. I believe a balance could be found that would be beneficial. Keeping it to yourself may be just as detrimental as the Jehovah’s Witness’ banging on my door. (did I go too far by getting a German sheppard?)
Yes, I see where you are coming from. Good point.
Maybe when the frog jumps out of the pot, he finds it cold outside, and jumps back in. Maybe when the slave is granted his freedom, he’ll miss the plantation. Maybe the free man longs for his comfortable warm prison cell. Our masters know this, and only turn up the heat enough to make the frogs jump, the slaves to work, and the free men to return to the work camps. You are right on about knowledge, and waking up to the lies that The massa done tol’ us. Never forget 9/11, and shine the light on the cockroaches. Watch them flee away in fear.
Yes, I get your point. I am referring to the top of the pyramid of power. The Ying and Yang so to speak. I know Eve was beguiled and Adam didn’t want to lose his baby so with all due respect he chose death. Everyone is making a decision. There’s no in between as far as I can comprehend. So back to flesh and blood—-I am thinking at this part of my sojourn—does this mean this battle we are referring to has to do with the death of our soul? It has been written that we should not fear the death of this body but we should fear that which can kill the soul. My research has lead me to believe that Angels are able to mate with the daughters of men but I have not read anything about an Angel be killed. Does this mean they are not flesh and blood and the questions become too numerous to address in this forum. I do appreciate your thoughtful comment.
“Does this mean they are not flesh and blood and the questions become too numerous to address in this forum.”–Zeki
To be of flesh and blood is to be human, so simply, in my humble opinion, angels are not human and humans are not angels. Though both are capable of replicating the others behaviors, we, as humans, have the God spark and are capable of greatness beyond that of angels.
If we so choose.
But, we are also equipped with the ability to do great harm, if we so choose….something I think angels are also incapable of, because the science of spirituality dictates our roles. We are here to learn what the angels already know.
Good Answer!
That is probably the very best way I’ve heard to explain that situation. Thanks.
To be of flesh and blood is to be human, so simply, in my humble opinion, angels are not human and humans are not angels
Me thinks angels have mated with daughters of men. Now the plot thickens. What are these part angel–part human beings? Of course this is supposition, so lets suppose– and look Weswardly. They would be a blood line–right? No doubt superior or and most likely— super natural. We are deep into the story and it has been written with God’s favorite creation in Mind. Oh what a magical mystery this thing called Space–for within it we will find obstuctions, and they do collide in a most purposeful way. One last question to pose—-Who has seen Space? Surely not the obstructions, for they only move within–never without.
Thick like molasses baby!
Who has seen space. I know of an individual. Though it will take convincing to reveal my source.
Look Weswardly….classic.
Oh yes, and if the scientific wonders believe that space is currently young and ever expanding,what is it exapanding into? Hmmm, what else could there be?
LF–could it be the same person who insisted the Universe is un-obstructed?or maybe the one who has seen the Wind? They be-here-now!! Of this I have great expectations. They think they are better than us–Gunga Din.
Picturepaint—They start coming for us. Weapons are drawn–people are killed. The major news can’t help but show the conflicts. People all of a sudden get it. Do you think this is going to happen? Not!!!! They are slowly going to continue the lullabye. Why wake the child up? Tantrums are not needed–just let the children sleep and before long they grow up into exactly what you have conditioned them to be—-NitWits.
We must not wait much longer. We’ve had plenty of sleep. Too much sleep makes for drogginess. The mind gets muddled. Here is where we find ourselves. It’s frustrating but true. Action must be taken. Are description of people and possibilities helpful? and if so, could it be we misconceive who they are helping? Could they be self-fulfilling plots designed to convince and conjure a new reality? What will be already is, for the future is the past of what it all could have been.
Ultimately–we do not fight flesh and blood. This being said–the force we battle, the one to surface just around the corner–will not be of this body. It will be supernatural. All else is deception.
The question asked by an American band(Kansas): Angels have fallen, fallen from Heaven, where have they gone?
“Ultimately–we do not fight flesh and blood.”
I have to disagree with that statement partially. I do agree we are fighting Satan but he will use every flesh and blood body he can conjure and they will kill. They already do all over the world. I am not argueing but comparing thoughts.
Thanks
Has anyone here ever been to the Middle East, Vietnam, WW2 as a soldier or during the time of war? I have been to Baghdad Iraq and have served with the US. Army and I have seen allot of bad things and I am sure those other wars are just the same. When the bad guys want to hurt you or your family, there is little you can do by yourself but die. Think real hard about what is possible in the future with letting the NWO gain control of our country, it will never be the same home again.
I think Wes is right to a point, we have to be passive and take the right avenues to fight the NWO or whatever they call themselves now a days. But I do believe violence will not be voluntary when the time comes. Those people will force you to do as they say and you will not be awarded a choice to accept or to turn down the act of violence. If you will not fight for yourselve’s then you will be killed if in the end a Hitler type faction is in charge. I also disagree that most people would accept a one world government because most people are either still oblivious to the NWO or refuse to acknowledge it is possible, but if given a choice I believe they would say no. If it does happen, it will be done by trickery as everything else they have done.
Wes is correct in saying that passive resistance is our only way to fight the NWO/OWG, but if One World Government does arise violence will be our only defense.
Lets see, the governments all do a terrific job of creating a total crazy mess of their respective countries for their citizens, so let’s invest more faith in their new idea? Lets take a vote on it?
Sounds Like another GREAT IDEA! Not!
How about this vote, Let’s vote to force the entire US congress and senate to resign immediately, give back their entire compensation for the past 30 years, and then elect representatives of the people of the US, sorry no more lobbyists or special interest group inputs, you’ve made your mess.
Watch out!!!! CANNONBALL!!!!
<<<<<<<>>>>>>>
“If half of all human adults vote”
“We are confident the human race is ready for this”
“It is right on time for a confluence of events that may bring humanity to its next stage of social evolution.” —This is a quote from a reader of the text who likened it to Thomas Paine’s Common Sense.
Jim Stark, author of Rescue Plan for Planet Earth, and president of VWG (vote world government) along with vp Ted Stalets are located in Nashville, Tenn. aka snakepit USA. http://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WM674N_Sudekum_Planetarium_Nashville_TN
Wes has been informing us of the egyptian connections and I continue to reread The Supriem Papers 1-5 to keep on my toes, BUT, what I feel is that I am failing miserably. Who is the OWO as opposed to the NWO. I recall Wes trying to clear up this issue on his old site I.N. but it still never gets any easier trying to differentiate between the “good guys” and the “bad guys”.
I mean, who says “human adults” when in reference to voting. Has anyone else out there ever heard of the most high council of hedge hogs holding a public vote? Or the Knights of Chinchillas’ trying to decide who will be their next treasurer? I am disturbed at the frequent use of the word “human” in their World Government Lingo.
Maybe my time on the mountain (not the woods Carol) has cleared my head too much. Anyway…..it is absurdly redundant to say such things unless they feel the mass medications have completeley ruined our cognitive abilities to think for ourselves. In which case they (humanoids) may feel obliged to remind us of our classification. In a word….Creepy.
Hey Mason! Hello Rose! Wazzup Carol!
Hope you are in good spirits Wes!
Hi Lonefrog: How ya doin? Me I am hanging in there. I went to see Star Trek at a local theater dinner house. Even JJ Abrams is messing with my universe. He goes and splits star trek on alternate time lines. The older spock is in the same time line as the younger spock and just messed up my universe…LOL
I also don’t recall ever getting an invitation to vote for anything of a global nature in this reality anyway.
I am not going to get heavy at all. I am on my way to get some shut eye. I guess I will start fresh later today.
Have a good one.
Rose
Hi Mason, Hi Carol, and especially Hi Lonefrog…
Oh and by the way………..
I VOTE NO TOO………..
THE ROSE……..:)
the o.w.o is the n.w.o. what they refer to as the new world order is actually nothing more than a “renaissance” of the old order, i.e. the “pharoahs” of ancient egypt being the godkings on earth ruling absolutely over all. nothing new about it. global dictatorship is global dictatorship regardless of what they call it. of course for those who aren’t knowledgeable about such things(as is the majority of people) it would appear at first to be “new”. my question is why would the ancient gods who at one time saw the need to diversify the population and avoid a one world collective of human ingenuity suddenly decide the opposite as being beneficial? i do have one thing to say to the n.w.o. globalists and that is just as the “godkings” of ancient egypt thought they were at the top and made all the rules the reality was that the priests behind the scenes were actually running things and when their prieslty influence and public stature was threatened (as the n.w.o. priests will be) they turned to undermining the pharoah ultimately bringing down the old way. perhaps these new old order advocates are too smart for their own good or as the folks at mensa perceive of themselves, they think they’re to good to get caught. we’ll see.
Would we need “World Government” if all countries would just get their own ducks in a row?! Answer: No. Would “World Government” work? Answer: Only for the elite. They just want us all to openly defer to them for everything. Passing the buck to another level doesn’t resolve anything. This must have been modeled on “The War on Drugs” or any of those other useless wars…Well, not entirely useless. Useful enough to manipulate people’s thoughts and emotions. How many deceased people are going to get onto the voter’s lists and magically vote this time around?!
I VOTE NO!
the thing is we don’t “need” a world anything. we are fed the perception of a need in order to bring it to fruition. would a world order benefit humanity? absolutely, but under one condition and that is the decision makers seated on the controlling board or panel must all be clones of mohatma and indira ghandi, jfk, martin l. king jr. and jesus himself and they must hold those seats of decision for ever! i say that because in reality those who would aspire for those positions are most likely sociopaths bent on dictatorship and personal gain which makes them easy to manipulate and control and NOT people you want running things. that being said, i, personally cannot condone a world government as it would appear that the only people of upstanding enough character and genuine concern for the ENTIRE human race have been assassinated, detained or in some other way removed from the public eye. that leaves no one we can trust to “run the world”. maybe some day such people will arise and step up and world order will be a good thing. until then my vote is definately NO. unfortunately, as the fraudulent placement of george bush as president of the u.s. shows us our “votes” on the matter are of no consequence. it will be what they want it to be. buy a gun.
Jeffrey,
Thank you for adding to my comment. I agree with you on the many levels you have presented.
I, Ian deMontfort, a writer, openly declare myself an enemy of the New World Order. There is nothing new about it. It is the Old World Order with a face lift. Murder and lies are its only principles. I will never be friends with something so corrupt. I am an enemy of One World Government and all the organisations created to support its rise. I am Ian and I oppose the enemies of love and freedom.