by Mike Hockney, The Illuminati (as opposed to the Global Elite), March 1, 2010
Published here: Tuesday, March 2, 2010 @ 6:19 AM
Wes Penre’s Comment: Note the last lines of this article: “And what of the Davidic bloodline today? That’s where Supriem Rockefeller, the Thule Society and the Brotherhood of the Shadows come into the frame. We will elaborate on this in our next article next week.”
A code is often centred on a single “dialectical compound” word. The famous example of “sangraal” (in old French) provides the best illustration. In the earliest Grail manuscripts, it was this compound word “sangraal” that was first used to refer to the Holy Grail, a mysterious entity previously unknown in literature, religion or history.
Sangraal can be decomposed into two forms in old French, the original language of the Grail tales: San Graal (Holy Grail) or Sang Raal (Blood Royal).
There are three ways of interpreting the compound term “sangraal”:
1) As a synthesis of the two separate terms (san graal and sang raal) i.e. both terms contribute equally to the meaning.
2) As an instruction to equate the two terms i.e. san graal = sang raal.
3) As an instruction to understand the two terms as constituting opposites i.e. san graal (thesis) is the opposite of sang raal (antithesis).
Famously, the authors of the groundbreaking book The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail chose the second interpretation as the correct way of making sense of sangraal, and were followed in this by Dan Brown in his best-selling novel The Da Vinci Code. They claimed that the secret of the Holy Grail was that it referred to a uniquely magical bloodline that could be traced back to Jesus Christ and his wife Mary Magdalene (and by extension to King David, from whom Jesus was supposedly descended).
In their view of the Holy Grail, it is a symbolic reference to the royal blood of the Hebrew House of David, and within that concept is contained the shocking idea (to Christians) that Jesus Christ had a wife and child (or children), with the corollary that he was just an ordinary man, not God, that he may not have died on the Cross and, if he did, he certainly wasn’t resurrected, even though the resurrection of Christ is the indispensable core of the Christian faith, without which it collapses. This is an “explosive” revelation, hence the huge international success of these two books.
The only problem with this theory is that the Holy Grail has no connection whatever with Jesus Christ, Mary Magdalene or any bloodline. The truth is that option 3) of the three possibilities listed above is the correct one i.e. the “Royal Blood” theory is the opposite of the reality of the Grail. The very last thing with which the Grail is concerned is a bloodline, a dynastic family, any anti-meritocratic principle of heredity that excludes everyone outside that family.
Those ingenious members of the Illuminati who first constructed this code were singularly successful in leading researchers in completely the wrong direction. People have been so bedazzled by the fake trail that they have lavished endless time, and shelf loads of books, on the Jesus theory. The tomb of Jesus, the family of Jesus, the skeleton of Jesus, the wanderings of Jesus after he escaped the crucifixion, have all been explored, and so have all the corresponding Mary Magdalene theories.
Yet none of it is connected with the truth of the Grail.
The Armageddon Conspiracy by “Mike Hockney” treats the Grail theory entirely differently and anyone seriously interested in Grail research should use this as their proper starting point.
‘There are intersection points between the three mysteries: certain key facts that all three have in common. Even if a seeker has become entrapped in one of the fake mysteries (both of which are as highly compelling as the real mystery), he will still have opportunities to switch to the real mystery if he makes the right choice at an intersection point. He will make the right choice only if he has the strength to abandon all of the work he has performed on either of the fake mysteries. This, in fact, is part of the test. Virtually no one makes the right choice because abandoning years of hard work is simply too difficult for most to contemplate, especially when they believe they have been making good progress. There is another trap: it is possible to move from one fake mystery to the other fake mystery, bypassing the true mystery. Several seekers have encountered this misfortune.
‘Anyone who makes significant progress on the real mystery will certainly be contacted, but must then undergo a long vetting process to ensure that they are not working for the enemy. The enemy has on two occasions come within one step of reaching the final stage of the real mystery. Preventing the enemy from accessing the final stage is paramount.
‘Your current status is classified as follows: you are making notable headway with one of the fake mysteries. You have encountered material that can direct you to an intersection point, but you have not yet moved in the right direction. You are deemed to have all of the necessary skills and attributes to move forward, but others have possessed such skills and attributes yet remained stuck in fruitless pursuit of fake mysteries. The fake mysteries are highly seductive but nevertheless valueless. No one has yet solved the fake mysteries, and some may even find them more alluring than the real mystery since they have implications that are as mind boggling as that of the real mystery, but they have not one particle of genuine evidence to substantiate them and are entirely speculative. (Imagine a painting that points, in an arcane way, to a manufactured mystery. A seeker might imagine that if he solves the painting’s code, he will advance closer to the truth. In fact, he has merely come closer to a false “truth”. But how would he know? That is always the dilemma.) The real mystery, on the other hand, is associated with indisputable evidence of its truth. If it did not have this evidence, it would long ago have been deemed unbelievable.’
We hope that seekers of the truth will now have an enhanced understanding of this rather cryptic statement. When we referred to “fake mysteries” we meant that they shed no genuine light on the quest for the Grail. However, we also said that the fake mysteries were as compelling as the real one, and this has been borne out by the incredible attention paid to the Jesus bloodline theory.
We also said that there was no “genuine evidence” to substantiate the fake mysteries and that they were “entirely speculative”. We must now be clearer on these points. We were referring strictly to the shedding of light on the Grail mystery i.e. since the two “fake” mysteries have no connection with the Grail then everything about them is false and groundless speculation in that specific context. However, it has been decided that the time is right to reveal that the only sense in which these other mysteries are false is in relation to the Grail.
Both mysteries are in fact entirely true outside the context of the Grail i.e. they conceal genuine, real secrets rather than fabricated secrets. It was decided by those brilliant minds that constructed this multi-layered mystery that the only way to convincingly disguise the truth of the Grail was to hide it amongst two other great and authentic mysteries. It was precisely because they were authentic that they would lure people away from the true trail. In other words, those seekers of the Grail who strayed off the correct path would not be pursuing hopeless chimeras, but rather major secrets in their own right, just not connected with the Grail.
The success of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail and The Da Vinci Code proves how well the formulators of the Grail mystery accomplished their task.
We said, “No one has yet solved the fake mysteries, and some may even find them more alluring than the real mystery since they have implications that are as mind boggling as that of the real mystery.” We will now admit that the authors of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail did in fact crack the essence of one of the “fake” mysteries – their conclusion that it was connected with a bloodline: with Mary Magdalene, Jesus and the Royal House of David is essentially correct. However, they did not fully solve the mystery that was set: they did not discover the tomb of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene, and probe the issue of whether Jesus Christ had two sets of bones! (Anyone who has carefully read our recent articles on Jesus Christ will understand to what we are referring.) Nor did they identify all the members of the main bloodline and provide a list of all those who have held the title of Davidic king “in waiting” since the time of Jesus Christ. To this day, such a person exists, and we will return to this subject in due course.
The story of the True Grail and the fake “Bloodline Grail” have a major intersection point that has caused the bulk of the confusion between the two separate mysteries. The key intersection is none other than King Solomon, son of King David, and also a key figure in the ancient Illuminati. It is precisely because he belongs to both mysteries that they have become hopelessly intertwined and confused.
The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail reflects the degree of confusion. It refers to the Cathars, the Knights Templar and the Freemasons in the same context as the Davidic bloodline when, other than Solomon, they have nothing whatever in common. This error is repeated in a multitude of popular books, and it also underlies the absurd proposition that the Illuminati are a secret society of sinister Jewish Elders.
The Gnostics, including the Cathars, renounced and denounced Yahweh. They taught reincarnation. They either rejected Jesus Christ or regarded him as a super-angelic being sent by the True God to help humanity: he was a phantom – pure spirit – because he did not enter the evil material world of the Demiurge. He did not enter into a fully human existence, did not die on the cross, and was not resurrected. The Creator of this wicked world of wailing and woe was the Demiurge, not the True God. The Demiurge, Satan, Rex Mundi, King of the World, the Creator of the earth, Yahweh, was evil. Faith was unimportant. Only knowledge mattered. No high priests were needed. The Gnostics taught the opposite of the Jews, so the two can never be equated.
The Holy Blood (sang raal) part of the story is a Judaic tale relating to Jesus, Mary Magdalene and the Royal House of David. The Holy Grail (san graal) part of the story is a Gnostic tale relating to Solomon, the Cathars, and the Templars (from whom the Freemasons later emerged).
Solomon was the key figure for the Templars and the Masons. He was also a Davidic King. Only those who know that he was an Illuminatus and an adherent of Gnostic teachings are able to resolve the apparent confusion. Again, The Armageddon Conspiracy by Mike Hockney provides the correct starting point. It illustrates that Gnosticism is so old that it is even encoded in the Biblical tale of Cain and Abel. Abel is the “hero” of Yahweh, and Cain the Gnostic hero of the True God. Solomon found himself in the position of being a Davidic King who was wise enough to see Yahweh for the monster he was.
To have any hope of understanding the true Grail mystery, you have to separate the Gnostic elements of the Grail legends from the Judaic elements; Solomon the Illuminatus from Solomon the Jewish King.
Most people seem oblivious to the fact that Solomon was regarded as a Magus, a man steeped in arcane lore, and so learned that he knew how to conjure and command the most powerful demons. He created sacred rites and occult ceremonies. In medieval times, he was regarded as the true author of the grimoire (textbook of practical magic and sorcery) known as the Clavis Salomonis (The Key of Solomon). He supposedly had the most powerful magic ring of all: the so-called Seal of Solomon. Hardly what you would expect of a faithful follower of Yahweh.
1 Kings 11:1-12 tells an extraordinary story:
1 Kings Chapter 11
1 Now king Solomon loved many foreign women, besides the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, and Hittites;
2 of the nations concerning which the LORD said unto the children of Israel: ‘Ye shall not go among them, neither shall they come among you; for surely they will turn away your heart after their gods’; Solomon did cleave unto these in love.
3 And he had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines; and his wives turned away his heart.
4 For it came to pass, when Solomon was old, that his wives turned away his heart after other gods; and his heart was not whole with the LORD his God, as was the heart of David his father.
5 For Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the detestation of the Ammonites.
6 And Solomon did that which was evil in the sight of the LORD, and went not fully after the LORD, as did David his father.
7 Then did Solomon build a high place for Chemosh the detestation of Moab, in the mount that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech the detestation of the children of Ammon.
9 And the LORD was angry with Solomon, because his heart was turned away from the LORD, the God of Israel, who had appeared unto him twice,
10 and had commanded him concerning this thing, that he should not go after other gods; but he kept not that which the LORD commanded.
11 Wherefore the LORD said unto Solomon: ‘Forasmuch as this hath been in thy mind, and thou hast not kept My covenant and My statutes, which I have commanded thee, I will surely rend the kingdom from thee, and will give it to thy servant.
12 Notwithstanding in thy days I will not do it, for David thy father’s sake; but I will rend it out of the hand of thy son.
According to this tale, Solomon was so contemptuous of Yahweh that he spurned direct commands from Yahweh on two occasions when Yahweh appeared to him. Yet, despite this, he and his son Rehoboam were allowed to retain the ownership of Yahweh’s holiest city, Jerusalem, where Yahweh’s holiest temple stood, and which housed the Ark of the Covenant in which Yahweh maintained his divine presence. Does any of that sound remotely credible? Surely Yahweh would never have allowed a disobedient king to continue to rule Jerusalem and to guard the Ark. The truth hidden by the false words is that Solomon hated Yahweh and was strong and powerful enough to resist the will of the tyrant, though his son was not.
The Kingdom of Israel fractured in the reign of Rehoboam, with ten tribes forming the Northern Kingdom of Israel and two tribes (Judah and and the much smaller tribe of Benjamin – see next section) forming the southern kingdom of Judah with its capital at Jerusalem.
It is truly extraordinary that no researchers have ever delved deeply into one of the most remarkable episodes in Biblical history: a full-scale civil war between the tribe of Benjamin (from whose ranks came Saul, the first king of Israel), and the other eleven tribes of Israel, led by the tribe of Judah (from whose ranks came King David and then King Solomon).
The whole story is told in chapters 19-21 of the Book of Judges:
19:1 And it came to pass in those days, when there was no king in Israel, that there was a certain Levite sojourning on the side of mount Ephraim, who took to him a concubine out of Bethlehemjudah. 2 And his concubine played the whore against him, and went away from him unto her father’s house to Bethlehemjudah, and was there four whole months.
3 And her husband arose, and went after her, to speak friendly unto her, and to bring her again, having his servant with him, and a couple of asses: and she brought him into her father’s house: and when the father of the damsel saw him, he rejoiced to meet him.
4 And his father in law, the damsel’s father, retained him; and he abode with him three days: so they did eat and drink, and lodged there.
5 And it came to pass on the fourth day, when they arose early in the morning, that he rose up to depart: and the damsel’s father said unto his son in law, Comfort thine heart with a morsel of bread, and afterward go your way.
6 And they sat down, and did eat and drink both of them together: for the damsel’s father had said unto the man, Be content, I pray thee, and tarry all night, and let thine heart be merry.
7 And when the man rose up to depart, his father in law urged him: therefore he lodged there again.
8 And he arose early in the morning on the fifth day to depart; and the damsel’s father said, Comfort thine heart, I pray thee. And they tarried until afternoon, and they did eat both of them.
9 And when the man rose up to depart, he, and his concubine, and his servant, his father in law, the damsel’s father, said unto him, Behold, now the day draweth toward evening, I pray you tarry all night: behold, the day groweth to an end, lodge here, that thine heart may be merry; and to morrow get you early on your way, that thou mayest go home.
10 But the man would not tarry that night, but he rose up and departed, and came over against Jebus, which is Jerusalem; and there were with him two asses saddled, his concubine also was with him.
11 And when they were by Jebus, the day was far spent; and the servant said unto his master, Come, I pray thee, and let us turn in into this city of the Jebusites, and lodge in it.
12 And his master said unto him, We will not turn aside hither into the city of a stranger, that is not of the children of Israel; we will pass over to Gibeah.
13 And he said unto his servant, Come, and let us draw near to one of these places to lodge all night, in Gibeah, or in Ramah.
14 And they passed on and went their way; and the sun went down upon them when they were by Gibeah, which belongeth to Benjamin.
15 And they turned aside thither, to go in and to lodge in Gibeah: and when he went in, he sat him down in a street of the city: for there was no man that took them into his house to lodging.
16 And, behold, there came an old man from his work out of the field at even, which was also of mount Ephraim; and he sojourned in Gibeah: but the men of the place were Benjamites.
17 And when he had lifted up his eyes, he saw a wayfaring man in the street of the city: and the old man said, Whither goest thou? and whence comest thou?
18 And he said unto him, We are passing from Bethlehemjudah toward the side of mount Ephraim; from thence am I: and I went to Bethlehemjudah, but I am now going to the house of the LORD; and there is no man that receiveth me to house.
19 Yet there is both straw and provender for our asses; and there is bread and wine also for me, and for thy handmaid, and for the young man which is with thy servants: there is no want of any thing.
20 And the old man said, Peace be with thee; howsoever let all thy wants lie upon me; only lodge not in the street.
21 So he brought him into his house, and gave provender unto the asses: and they washed their feet, and did eat and drink.
22 Now as they were making their hearts merry, behold, the men of the city, certain sons of Belial, beset the house round about, and beat at the door, and spake to the master of the house, the old man, saying, Bring forth the man that came into thine house, that we may know him.
23 And the man, the master of the house, went out unto them, and said unto them, Nay, my brethren, nay, I pray you, do not so wickedly; seeing that this man is come into mine house, do not this folly.
24 Behold, here is my daughter a maiden, and his concubine; them I will bring out now, and humble ye them, and do with them what seemeth good unto you: but unto this man do not so vile a thing.
25 But the men would not hearken to him: so the man took his concubine, and brought her forth unto them; and they knew her, and abused her all the night until the morning: and when the day began to spring, they let her go.
26 Then came the woman in the dawning of the day, and fell down at the door of the man’s house where her lord was, till it was light.
27 And her lord rose up in the morning, and opened the doors of the house, and went out to go his way: and, behold, the woman his concubine was fallen down at the door of the house, and her hands were upon the threshold.
28 And he said unto her, Up, and let us be going. But none answered. Then the man took her up upon an ass, and the man rose up, and gat him unto his place.
29 And when he was come into his house, he took a knife, and laid hold on his concubine, and divided her, together with her bones, into twelve pieces, and sent her into all the coasts of Israel.
30 And it was so, that all that saw it said, There was no such deed done nor seen from the day that the children of Israel came up out of the land of Egypt unto this day: consider of it, take advice, and speak your minds.
Note the astounding similarity between Judges 19:17-25 and Genesis 19:1-13:
19:1 And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground;
2 And he said, Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into your servant’s house, and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye shall rise up early, and go on your ways. And they said, Nay; but we will abide in the street all night.
3 And he pressed upon them greatly; and they turned in unto him, and entered into his house; and he made them a feast, and did bake unleavened bread, and they did eat.
4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:
5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.
6 And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him,
7 And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.
8 Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.
9 And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed sore upon the man, even Lot, and came near to break the door.
10 But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door.
11 And they smote the men that were at the door of the house with blindness, both small and great: so that they wearied themselves to find the door.
12 And the men said unto Lot, Hast thou here any besides? son in law, and thy sons, and thy daughters, and whatsoever thou hast in the city, bring them out of this place:
13 For we will destroy this place, because the cry of them is waxen great before the face of the LORD; and the LORD hath sent us to destroy it.
So, is the story of Sodom and Gomorrah in the Book of Genesis actually telling precisely the same story as the destruction of the tribe of Benjamin by the other tribes of Israel?
Mary Magdalene, wife of Jesus Christ, was said to be of royal blood, of the tribe of Benjamin, and from her originated the famous Merovingian royal dynasty of France.
Now look at Luke 8:1-3
1 After this, Jesus traveled about from one town and village to another, proclaiming the good news of the kingdom of God. The Twelve were with him,
2 and also some women who had been cured of evil spirits and diseases: Mary (called Magdalene) from whom seven demons had come out;
3 Joanna the wife of Cuza, the manager of Herod’s household; Susanna; and many others. These women were helping to support them out of their own means.
We see that Mary Magdalene was said to have had seven demons cast out of her by Jesus. Jesus also had in his entourage the wife (Joanna) of a senior member of King Herod’s household. (Joanna was one of Jesus’ sisters.)
Does the reference to Mary’s seven demons refer to the fact that the Benjamites were commonly regarded as demonic devil worshippers by other Hebrews?
Returning to the Book of Judges, we read:
20:1 Then all the children of Israel went out, and the congregation was gathered together as one man, from Dan even to Beersheba, with the land of Gilead, unto the LORD in Mizpeh.
2 And the chief of all the people, even of all the tribes of Israel, presented themselves in the assembly of the people of God, four hundred thousand footmen that drew sword.
3 (Now the children of Benjamin heard that the children of Israel were gone up to Mizpeh.) Then said the children of Israel, Tell us, how was this wickedness?
4 And the Levite, the husband of the woman that was slain, answered and said, I came into Gibeah that belongeth to Benjamin, I and my concubine, to lodge.
5 And the men of Gibeah rose against me, and beset the house round about upon me by night, and thought to have slain me: and my concubine have they forced, that she is dead.
6 And I took my concubine, and cut her in pieces, and sent her throughout all the country of the inheritance of Israel: for they have committed lewdness and folly in Israel.
7 Behold, ye are all children of Israel; give here your advice and counsel.
8 And all the people arose as one man, saying, We will not any of us go to his tent, neither will we any of us turn into his house.
9 But now this shall be the thing which we will do to Gibeah; we will go up by lot against it;
10 And we will take ten men of an hundred throughout all the tribes of Israel, and an hundred of a thousand, and a thousand out of ten thousand, to fetch victual for the people, that they may do, when they come to Gibeah of Benjamin, according to all the folly that they have wrought in Israel.
11 So all the men of Israel were gathered against the city, knit together as one man.
12 And the tribes of Israel sent men through all the tribe of Benjamin, saying, What wickedness is this that is done among you?
13 Now therefore deliver us the men, the children of Belial, which are in Gibeah, that we may put them to death, and put away evil from Israel. But the children of Benjamin would not hearken to the voice of their brethren the children of Israel.
14 But the children of Benjamin gathered themselves together out of the cities unto Gibeah, to go out to battle against the children of Israel.
15 And the children of Benjamin were numbered at that time out of the cities twenty and six thousand men that drew sword, beside the inhabitants of Gibeah, which were numbered seven hundred chosen men.
16 Among all this people there were seven hundred chosen men lefthanded; every one could sling stones at an hair breadth, and not miss.
17 And the men of Israel, beside Benjamin, were numbered four hundred thousand men that drew sword: all these were men of war.
18 And the children of Israel arose, and went up to the house of God, and asked counsel of God, and said, Which of us shall go up first to the battle against the children of Benjamin? And the LORD said, Judah shall go up first.
19 And the children of Israel rose up in the morning, and encamped against Gibeah.
20 And the men of Israel went out to battle against Benjamin; and the men of Israel put themselves in array to fight against them at Gibeah.
21 And the children of Benjamin came forth out of Gibeah, and destroyed down to the ground of the Israelites that day twenty and two thousand men.
22 And the people the men of Israel encouraged themselves, and set their battle again in array in the place where they put themselves in array the first day.
23 (And the children of Israel went up and wept before the LORD until even, and asked counsel of the LORD, saying, Shall I go up again to battle against the children of Benjamin my brother? And the LORD said, Go up against him.)
24 And the children of Israel came near against the children of Benjamin the second day.
25 And Benjamin went forth against them out of Gibeah the second day, and destroyed down to the ground of the children of Israel again eighteen thousand men; all these drew the sword.
26 Then all the children of Israel, and all the people, went up, and came unto the house of God, and wept, and sat there before the LORD, and fasted that day until even, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings before the LORD.
27 And the children of Israel enquired of the LORD, (for the ark of the covenant of God was there in those days,
28 And Phinehas, the son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron, stood before it in those days,) saying, Shall I yet again go out to battle against the children of Benjamin my brother, or shall I cease? And the LORD said, Go up; for to morrow I will deliver them into thine hand.
29 And Israel set liers in wait round about Gibeah.
30 And the children of Israel went up against the children of Benjamin on the third day, and put themselves in array against Gibeah, as at other times.
31 And the children of Benjamin went out against the people, and were drawn away from the city; and they began to smite of the people, and kill, as at other times, in the highways, of which one goeth up to the house of God, and the other to Gibeah in the field, about thirty men of Israel.
32 And the children of Benjamin said, They are smitten down before us, as at the first. But the children of Israel said, Let us flee, and draw them from the city unto the highways.
33 And all the men of Israel rose up out of their place, and put themselves in array at Baaltamar: and the liers in wait of Israel came forth out of their places, even out of the meadows of Gibeah.
34 And there came against Gibeah ten thousand chosen men out of all Israel, and the battle was sore: but they knew not that evil was near them.
35 And the LORD smote Benjamin before Israel: and the children of Israel destroyed of the Benjamites that day twenty and five thousand and an hundred men: all these drew the sword.
36 So the children of Benjamin saw that they were smitten: for the men of Israel gave place to the Benjamites, because they trusted unto the liers in wait which they had set beside Gibeah.
37 And the liers in wait hasted, and rushed upon Gibeah; and the liers in wait drew themselves along, and smote all the city with the edge of the sword.
38 Now there was an appointed sign between the men of Israel and the liers in wait, that they should make a great flame with smoke rise up out of the city.
39 And when the men of Israel retired in the battle, Benjamin began to smite and kill of the men of Israel about thirty persons: for they said, Surely they are smitten down before us, as in the first battle.
40 But when the flame began to arise up out of the city with a pillar of smoke, the Benjamites looked behind them, and, behold, the flame of the city ascended up to heaven.
41 And when the men of Israel turned again, the men of Benjamin were amazed: for they saw that evil was come upon them.
42 Therefore they turned their backs before the men of Israel unto the way of the wilderness; but the battle overtook them; and them which came out of the cities they destroyed in the midst of them.
43 Thus they inclosed the Benjamites round about, and chased them, and trode them down with ease over against Gibeah toward the sunrising.
44 And there fell of Benjamin eighteen thousand men; all these were men of valour.
45 And they turned and fled toward the wilderness unto the rock of Rimmon: and they gleaned of them in the highways five thousand men; and pursued hard after them unto Gidom, and slew two thousand men of them.
46 So that all which fell that day of Benjamin were twenty and five thousand men that drew the sword; all these were men of valour.
47 But six hundred men turned and fled to the wilderness unto the rock Rimmon, and abode in the rock Rimmon four months.
48 And the men of Israel turned again upon the children of Benjamin, and smote them with the edge of the sword, as well the men of every city, as the beast, and all that came to hand: also they set on fire all the cities that they came to.
According to this chapter, the Tribe of Benjamin was willing to fight a savage and deadly war with the other tribes of Israel for the sake of not handing over for execution a group of rapists and murderers who worshipped Belial. This Biblical story is insane. The hidden truth is that the Benjamites attempted to seize from the Levite tribe their priestly functions, and to turn Israel away from the worship of Yahweh. The Levites appealed to the other Israeli tribes for assistance, and received it. The heretical Benjamites were then put to the sword in an exterminatory holy war, just like the heretical Cathars of Southern France many centuries later.
Chapter 21 of Judges then explains that the other tribes felt guilty about what they had done, and tried to reconstitute the tribe by slaughtering the husbands and wives of a foreign city and kidnapping all of the virgins, to be handed over to the surviving Benjamites. It still wasn’t enough and the Benjamites were allowed to go raiding to kidnap more women. And all of this was done in the name of Yahweh.
Is Yahweh not Satan himself? Read for yourself the words of Yahweh’s “holy” Bible:
10 And the congregation sent thither twelve thousand men of the valiantest, and commanded them, saying, Go and smite the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead with the edge of the sword, with the women and the children.
11 And this is the thing that ye shall do, Ye shall utterly destroy every male, and every woman that hath lain by man.
14 And Benjamin came again at that time; and they gave them wives which they had saved alive of the women of Jabeshgilead: and yet so they sufficed them not.
16 Then the elders of the congregation said, How shall we do for wives for them that remain, seeing the women are destroyed out of Benjamin?
18 Howbeit we may not give them wives of our daughters: for the children of Israel have sworn, saying, Cursed be he that giveth a wife to Benjamin.
20 Therefore they commanded the children of Benjamin, saying, Go and lie in wait in the vineyards;
22 And it shall be, when their fathers or their brethren come unto us to complain, that we will say unto them, Be favourable unto them for our sakes: because we reserved not to each man his wife in the war: for ye did not give unto them at this time, that ye should be guilty.
25 In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes.
Note the last words. The argument is that Israel is falling into anarchy and a strong man – a king – is required to restore order.
Also, note that the king (Saul) who is subsequently appointed is none other than a Benjamite. Is it not truly extraordinary that a tribe so hated by the others should furnish Israel with its first king?
Things go very badly, and Saul’s reign ends in defeat in battle against the Philistines, followed by his suicide:
“Despite the oath(s) of reconciliation, the biblical text states that David felt insecure, and so made an alliance with the Philistines, becoming their vassal. Emboldened by this, the Philistines prepared to attack Israel, and Saul led out his army to face them at Mount Gilboa, but before the battle decided to secretly consult the witch of Endor for advice. The witch, unaware of who he is, reminds Saul that the king (i.e. Saul himself) had made witchery a capital offence, but after being assured that Saul wouldn’t harm her, the witch conjures up the ghost of Samuel. Samuel’s ghost tells Saul that he would lose the battle and his life.
“Broken in spirit, Saul returns to face the enemy, and the Israelites are duly defeated. To escape the ignominy of capture, Saul asks his armour bearer to kill him, but is forced to commit suicide by falling on his sword when the armour bearer refuses.”
Note that David, the future great king of Israel and ancestor of Jesus Christ, betrays Israel and forms an alliance with the Philistines, and that Saul, the current king, consorts with a witch! Clearly, Israel was in absolute turmoil in this period, with the trouble centred on the tribes of Benjamin (Saul’s tribe) and Judah (David’s tribe). These same two tribes were brought together centuries later in the marriage of Mary Magdalene (tribe of Benjamin) and Jesus (tribe of Judah).
After Saul’s suicide, his son Ish-bosheth took over, but was soon assassinated by his own men:
2 Samuel 2:8-10
8 Now Abner the son of Ner, captain of Saul’s host, had taken Ish-bosheth the son of Saul, and brought him over to Mahanaim;
9 and he made him king over Gilead, and over the Ashurites, and over Jezreel, and over Ephraim, and over Benjamin, and over all Israel.
10 Ish-bosheth Saul’s son was forty years old when he began to reign over Israel, and he reigned two years. But the house of Judah followed David.
Note that Ish-bosheth means “Man of Baal.” In 1 Kings 18, we read that Elijah, the prophet of Yahweh, engaged in a bitter contest with the priests of Baal, so why did the first King of Israel call his son “Man of Baal”?
Ish-bosheth is assassinated and David is appointed king of Israel. But Wise Solomon, David’s son, displays no allegiance to Yahweh. And in the reign of Rehoboam, Solomon’s son, the division in Israel becomes so severe that the nation splits in two. The tribes of Judah and Benjamin form the Kingdom of Judah while the other ten create the new Kingdom of Israel, in which the tribe of Joseph is dominant.
It’s obvious that the two kingly tribes of Israel (Judah and Benjamin) had completely alienated the other tribes (for either political, dynastic, economic or religious reasons, or a combination of all of these).
We know that Solomon and his son were not loyal followers of Yahweh. So what about the new Northern kingdom of Israel under their king Jeroboam? Were they loyal to Yahweh?
Here’s what Wikipedia says:
Religion in the Kingdom of Israel
“The religious climate of the Kingdom of Israel appears to have followed two major trends. The first, that of Yahweh detailed in the Hebrew Bible, and the second the cult of Baal as detailed in the so-called “Baal cycle” discovered at Ugarit.
“It is recorded that Jeroboam built two places of worship, one at Bethel and one at far northern Dan, to be an alternative to the Temple at Jerusalem. He did not want the people of his kingdom to have religious ties to Jerusalem, the capital city of the rival Kingdom of Judah. He had golden calves erected for the people to represent their “god.” These acts became known as the way of Jeroboam or the sins of Jeroboam. (1 Kings 12:26-29)
“Ahab allowed the cult worship of Baal to become an acceptable religion of the kingdom. His wife Jezebel was a devotee to Baal worship. (1 Kings 16:31)”
So, we see an ongoing conflict between worshippers of Baal and Yahweh. Far from being devoted monotheists all dutifully obeying Yahweh, the Hebrew tribes were engaged in constant religious and political warfare, going as far back as the blood-letting at the foot of Mount Sinai during the Golden Calf incident, as described in the Book of Exodus. The Hebrews were utterly divided, so much so that their united kingdom collapsed into two separate kingdoms.
In 732 BCE, Israel attacked Judah, and the king of Judah sought help from Assyria. The Assyrians conquered part of Israel and deported most of the population to Assyria. Judah became a client state of the Assyrian empire. So much for the unity of the Hebrews. The remainder of Israel survived for another few years until, in 720 BCE, it also succumbed to Assyria, and the rest of the population was deported. These were the famous Lost Ten Tribes of Israel. Of the original twelve tribes, only the tribes of Judah and Benjamin in the southern Kingdom of Judah remained (with some Levite priests).
The kingdom of Judah was itself destroyed by Nebuchadrezzar II of Babylon in 586 BCE, and the people deported as slaves to Babylon.
The Jews exiled in Babylon were liberated when Cyrus the Great of Persia conquered the Babylonian empire, and they were allowed to return to Judah, which became part of the Persian Empire. The Persian Empire fell in due course to Alexander the Great. One of his generals, Seleucus, then ran the Eastern part of the old Persian Empire. The Seleucid rule of Israel was overthrown by the Maccabean Revolt in 165 BCE, and the era of the Hasmoneans was ushered in, lasting until the Herodian regime of the New Testament took over. Prior to that, Israel had become a client state of the Roman empire in 64 BCE when Pompey the Great conquered the territory. Later, Judah and Samaria became Judea, a province of the Roman Empire, while Galilee in Northern Israel continued to be ruled by the Herodian regime.
The point of all of this is to explode the myth that the Jews love to promote that they were always an integrated, united people exclusively worshipping a single God – Yahweh – for thousands of years. That they were and are the “Chosen People”.
The reality, as we have demonstrated, was completely different. The tribes of Israel were at each other’s throats, sometimes engaging in genocidal campaigns against one another. The Benjamites in particular were regarded as demon-worshippers, devils and abominations, all summed up in the concept of “Sodom and Gomorrah”, two cities apparently so wicked they deserved to be wiped off the face of the earth. The kings of Israel frequently had no loyalty whatever to Yahweh and often openly worshipped other gods in the Temple of Solomon itself. Solomon himself did not believe in Yahweh, and nor did his son – although they may have paid a certain degree of lip service in public to placate rival factions.
The War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness was an extraordinary document found amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls and is sometimes called the “War Rule”. The apocalyptic prophecy related in the document describes a war between the Sons of Light (the congregation of God) and the Sons of Darkness (the congregation of men, comprising the forces of Belial in alliance with those who “violated the covenant”: the sons of Levi, Judah, and Benjamin. At the last, the forces of darkness will be utterly annihilated. The Sons of Light will be led into the final battle by the Leader of the Congregation.
This is the surest proof that the priestly tribe of Israel – the Levites – and the two kingly tribes – the Davidic and Benjamite tribes – were regarded as evil by the remaining tribes of Israel. No one has ever explained this extraordinary fact. Particularly remarkable is that the High Priests of Yahweh, the guardians of the Ark of the Covenant – the Levites – are accused of being violators of the covenant too.
The Samaritans, the people of Samaria (the central part of Israel), were by the time of Jesus Christ regarded as non-Jewish. Simon Magus, the greatest of the Illuminati’s Grand Masters, was a Samaritan, and he was certainly no follower of Yahweh.
The Jews, over their long history, were exposed to Canaanite, Egyptian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Persian, Greek and Roman religious thinking. Israel was a melting pot of religious ideas and there was no unity whatever. The “Jews” were quite happy to worship bulls, golden calves, Baal and any number of other gods. Now you can see why the Jewish High Priests were so keen to enforce the first four commandments:
· You shall have no other Gods but me.
· You shall not make for yourself any idol, nor bow down to it or worship it.
· You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God.
· You shall remember and keep the Sabbath day holy.
These were daily problems that they encountered all around them. But ask yourself this. Would the True God care about any of these Commandments? Why would he be jealous? Why would he fear rivals? Why would he be afraid of name-calling or idols? Only if he were a false god, terrified that he was not legitimate.
The Demiurge was always said by ancient Gnostics to be so deluded as to believe that he was the True God. This was his supreme tragedy. The first four Hebrew Commandments are designed to protect him from the truth about his true nature, true identity and his true position in the universe.
In practice, the ancient Jews broke these Commandments all the time. They barely believed in Yahweh at all. Cast your mind back to the Exodus fable. Apparently God smote the Egyptians with ten terrible plagues, the last one being the extermination of all the firstborn of Egypt on a single night – a cataclysmic event recorded nowhere in Egyptian history. If it had genuinely happened it would represent conclusive proof of the existence of an intelligent supernatural force intervening in human affairs. No one could conclude that it was benign force, however. It would rightly be regarded as murderously evil and utterly Satanic. Certainly, the terrible memory would have been burned into Egyptian history forever. But there’s not a single mention of it.
This Satanic Yahweh then allegedly protected the Hebrews from Pharaoh’s chariots by appearing as a miraculous pillar of fire, and he empowered Moses to part the Red Sea – a miracle of miracles. He then fed the starving people via manna from heaven and he provided water for tens of thousands of people from a single rock. Now, if these things had actually taken place, not only would every Jew never again have doubted Yahweh for an instant, but every Egyptian would have started worshipping Yahweh too. But no Egyptian did. And the Hebrews were so unimpressed with Yahweh that the Book of Exodus admits that they wanted to kill Yahweh’s great prophet Moses. And, no sooner had he gone to the summit of Mount Sinai than many started worshipping a Golden Calf and had to be massacred.
The “truth” of the Old Testament is that far from telling the tale of Jewish love and loyalty towards Yahweh, it tells almost the opposite tale: of massive resistance to this cruel and monstrous deity. This resistance endured for centuries, especially amongst the kings of Israel.
In fact, only one group of Jews actively supported Yahweh through thick and thin, and their perseverance through every misfortune eventually paid off. Ostensibly, they were the priests and prophets of Israel, the holy men and patriarchs. But in reality they were the archons of the Demiurge, and they finally managed to get every Jew to worship the Devil. And then every Christian started worshipping this Satan, and every Muslim too. It is the most breathtaking triumph of evil in human history. All across the world, to this very day, billions of people get on their knees and bow down to Satan himself as if he were the True God. The Bible of Satan is read aloud in synagogues, churches and mosques every day all across the globe.
Hundreds of millions have perished because of the Abrahamic faiths. Death and destruction has poured down on the human race. The Four Riders of the Apocalypse had followed wherever the Torah, the Bible and the Koran have been taught.
Isn’t it time to break the rule of Satan? Many of the ancient Hebrews, foremost amongst them the great Illuminatus Solomon, understood what had to be done.
We honour all those ancient Hebrews, especially the heroic and martyred tribe of Benjamin, the forerunners of the holy Cathars, who saw through the lies of Yahweh and resisted his tyranny. Isn’t it time modern Jews did the same? It’s no disgrace to admit you were wrong. It would be one of the noblest actions of all time.
The Illuminati’s Grail Mystery contains a second dialectal compound word, but this has never been identified, so the second “fake” mystery concerning the Grail has never been seriously investigated. A few books have touched upon it, but never realised the significance of what they glossed over in a few sentences, usually while they were hurrying on to say more about the Jesus Bloodline theory. A few researchers have stumbled onto the second mystery, but not stayed on track for long.
Like the Jesus Bloodline, the second “fake” Grail mystery is astoundingly powerful in its own right, and we await the day when a clever researcher makes genuine progress with it.
Following Jesus’ alleged resurrection, John 20:14-16 says: [Mary] saw Jesus standing; and she knew not that it was Jesus. Jesus saith to her, “Woman, why weepest thou? Whom seekest thou?” She, thinking it was the gardener, saith to him: “Sir, if thou hast taken him hence, tell me where thou hast laid him, and I will take him away.” Jesus saith to her, “Mary.” She turning, saith to him “Rabboni” (which is to say, Master).
In other words, Mary only knows that it’s Jesus because of his way of speaking, his mannerisms, and his presence.
This is the most important section of the Christian Gospels, and of the entire Christian religion. What is truly astounding about it is that it represents the clearest possible proof that the central belief of Christianity is false. This passage from the Beloved Disciple proves beyond any doubt that the claim being made regarding Jesus Christ was not that he was resurrected but rather reincarnated, a spectacularly different concept.
Further evidence of Jesus’ radically altered appearance is provided in the following passages:
Mark 16:12 And after that he appeared in another shape to two of them walking, as they were going into the country.
“Another shape”? They mean a different body – reincarnation.
Luke 24:15-16 And it came to pass, that while they talked and reasoned with themselves, Jesus himself also drawing near, went with them. But their eyes were held, that they should not know him.
“But their eyes were held, that they should not know him?” Why not? What did he have to hide? Was he playing mind games? If he had been resurrected in his old body, why was he so reluctant to show himself properly, and instead creating doubt in the minds of his anxious followers? Or is this another passage showing that he was in fact in a new body because he had been reincarnated?
No wonder Doubting Thomas was so doubtful: he literally couldn’t believe his eyes because the person in front of him clearly didn’t look anything like Jesus.
John 21:4 But when the morning was come, Jesus stood on the shore; yet the disciples knew not that it was Jesus.
Why not? Because his appearance was entirely different thanks to the fact that he was in a new body as a result of reincarnation.
John 21:12 Jesus saith to them, “Come, and dine.” And none of them who were at meat, durst ask him, “Who art thou?”, knowing it was the Lord.
Why would they be tempted to ask Jesus who he was if he looked exactly like his former self, so clearly he didn’t? As with the incident involving Mary Magdalene, it is Jesus’ presence that identifies him, not his appearance, which is manifestly utterly different from his previous appearance.
Ask any Christian to rationalise these passages from their “infallible” Gospels. Ask them why they are not regarded as definitive proof of reincarnation rather than bodily resurrection. If bodily resurrection had indeed taken place, no one would have had the slightest difficulty recognising Jesus Christ.
So, which is the greater cover-up: the fact that Jesus was married and had children, or that Jesus was not resurrected at all, but reincarnated? Either way, both are deadly to the Christian faith.
Christians pour scorn on the idea of reincarnation, yet it is staring them right in the face in their own most sacred scriptures. Isn’t that extraordinary? One hundred percent of Christians lack the vaguest idea of the truth of what they profess to believe. They will take their “faith” to the grave with them, and it will be entirely in vain. Christians quite literally don’t understand the first thing about the truth of Jesus Christ. Few of them have actually taken the trouble to read their “sacred” texts and those that have are too brainwashed and stupid to see what is right in front of them.
Saint Paul shows how central the concept of resurrection is to Christian thinking:
Corinthians 15:13-14 But if there be no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen again. And if Christ be not risen again, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain.
That’s exactly right, Paul. Your preaching was in vain, and the faith of all Christians is in vain. And the biggest irony of all was that the Gospels themselves contained the proof. Resurrection is a ludicrous and false teaching that leads everyone who believes in it far from truth and enlightenment. The Eastern religions were sufficiently wise not to fall into this deadly error.
The most commonly accepted theory of resurrection asserts that we have one immaterial soul and one material body. Death kills the physical body, but the soul, being immortal, survives. On the day of resurrection, the body is fully restored.
The alternative theory is that the soul and body die together and both are restored together i.e. in this theory the soul isn’t immortal because it dies with the body, but, like the body, it can be fully brought back to life. Once body and soul are restored they are both immortal from that point onwards.
The theory of resurrection is, actually, incredibly complicated when it is studied properly, and many simplistic assumptions have to be cast aside. The standard version of resurrection theory can be challenged straight away by asking why is a body needed at all for the immortal, immaterial soul i.e. what actual function is served by bodily resurrection?
Most Christians have no idea of the confusion that exists in resurrection theory. For example, they are completely unable to say what the difference is between the Last Judgment and the “Particular” Judgment.
Wikipedia provides an excellent description of the Roman Catholic position, which is usually the most philosophically well-grounded Christian position (though often less scripturally supported).
Here’s what Wikipedia says:
Belief in the last judgment (sometime said universal judgment) is held firmly inside Roman Catholicism. Immediately upon death each soul undergoes the particular judgment, and depending upon the state of the person’s soul, goes to heaven, purgatory, or hell. The last judgement will occur after the resurrection of the dead and the reuniting of a person’s soul with own physical body.
The Catholic Church teaches that at the time of the last judgment Christ will come in his glory, and all the angels with him, and in his presence the truth of each man’s relationship with God will be laid bare, and each person who has ever lived will be judged with perfect justice. Those already in heaven will remain in heaven; those already in hell will remain in hell; and those in purgatory will be released into heaven. The Roman Catholic Church holds no doctrinal position on the fate of those in Limbo. Following the last judgment, the bliss of heaven and the pains of hell will be perfected in that those present will also be capable of physical bliss/pain. After the last judgment the universe itself will be renewed with a new heaven and a new earth.
This is called having your cake and eating it. You get an immortal soul that can detach itself from your body upon death and go straight to heaven, and a body that is eventually resurrected. But if your soul can exist in heaven without a body, why does your soul then have to be reunited with your body at the Last Judgment? And what age will this body be? If you died at 100 years-old, presumably you get a younger, healthier body…bit how young? And why do you need lungs and sex organs in heaven where there is no air and no sex? And why do you need to eat and drink? Do you urinate and defecate? What are the sewers like in heaven? None of it makes the slightest bit of sense.
Also, if you have already gone to heaven or hell because of the Particular Judgment then you won’t be greatly affected by the Last Judgment. After all, if you’re already in hell, what’s the worst that can happen to you? Things can’t exactly get worse, can they?
Those Protestant Christians who deny the Particular Judgment commit themselves to a position where your decomposing body (assuming you weren’t cremated) and your soul lie together mouldering in the grave for thousands or even millions of years before being resurrected on Judgment Day. In other words, your soul is effectively as dead as your body for an indefinite period. When you die, your soul doesn’t go to straight to heaven as you might have hoped but actually exists in some undefined state akin to death until you are resurrected. Many people might not find it a particularly comforting idea that their recently departed nearest and dearest are currently in the pre-Judgment Day “twilight zone” of non-existence, and that they themselves will join them in this bizarre state for an unspecified time.
The Jewish sect of Pharisees believed in the resurrection of a united soul and body, but they rejected the idea of an independent, immortal soul. The Jewish sect of Sadducees, on the other hand, denied both resurrection and an immortal soul, but tended towards some bleak idea of a vague continuation of a spiritual existence in a grim underworld called Sheol where the dead became empty shades, or ghosts, with perhaps a chance that God might help those who had lived a righteous life.
Jesus Christ, in his public teachings, took the position of the Pharisees, but rejected that of the Sadducees. St Paul of Tarsus (a member of the tribe of Benjamin, son of a Pharisee, and with some training as a Pharisee himself) understood Jesus’ teaching but merged it with the Persian-Romano-Greek teachings of Mithraism that the soul was immortal and could journey through the heavens to God.
Yet the actual text of the gospels proves, conclusively, that what was being described was reincarnation rather than resurrection. The Gospels hid the inconvenient fact that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene yet, astonishingly, did nothing to conceal that the true core of Christianity is not resurrection at all, but reincarnation.
The theory of reincarnation is that we have a permanent soul that passes through a succession of temporal bodies until it finds final enlightenment (gnosis) and escape from the cycle of birth, death and rebirth.
The first passage we quoted from John tells us two things: Jesus’ own wife, Mary Magdalene, did not recognise him after his resurrection. Nor did she think that he was some mystically transformed supernatural being from the celestial plane. Rather mundanely, she mistook him for the gardener.
If you are a Christian and you believe that Christ lived on after his death on the cross then, if you acknowledge the truth of your own holy scriptures, you have no option but to recognise that the tale of Jesus Christ relates to reincarnation and not resurrection. Jesus’ “soul” did not return to his former body but instead transferred to a completely different body.
And you have to ask yourself why no one has ever mentioned this before when it is so plainly stated? Is that what brainwashing does to people? Billions of people have had the gospels drummed into their heads from birth, yet not one of them has ever challenged the one core resurrection belief of Christianity, which is actually conclusively and irrefutably disproved by the Gospels. Christianity is the biggest deception in history and yet, remarkably, it apparently didn’t seek to deceive anyone because it openly states the truth of reincarnation rather than resurrection.
The Desposyni (from the Greek meaning “of or belonging to the master or lord”) is a term describing the blood relatives of Jesus. Jesus had many brothers and sisters, and eventually had four children, so the Desposyni became quite a large group over the years.
Jesus married Mary Magdalene at the wedding feast at Cana. By the time of Jesus’ crucifixion, Mary was pregnant with their first daughter Sarah.
Mary Magdalene went to France accompanied by Jesus (in reincarnated form), Joseph of Arimathea (brother of Jesus), Martha (sister of Mary), Lazarus (brother of Mary), Salome (sister of Jesus), Joanna (sister of Jesus), Mary (sister of Jesus) and Mary (mother of Jesus). In other words, the party that went to France consisted of members of the two families of the married couple Jesus and Mary Magdalene.
In France, Mary and Jesus had a son (also called Jesus, or, rather, Yehoshua), another daughter (Tamar), and a second son Joseph (Yosef).
Jesus’ secret teaching to all of those who went with him to France was that when he had prophesied that he would rise again, he actually meant that he would be reborn via reincarnation. (Normally, but not necessarily, reincarnation takes place via babies, not adults.) Jesus explained that he had no choice but to use the language of resurrection rather than reincarnation in his public pronouncements because that’s what Judaism taught and it would have been suicidal to teach a gentile Greek and Eastern doctrine of reincarnation.
As we explained in a previous article, Jesus’ original plan was to fake his death on the cross and then emerge “resurrected” from his tomb. In the religious mania that would surely ensue, the Romans would be forced out of Judea by a huge and unstoppable popular uprising, Jesus would depart the country forever (he would claim to have “ascended to heaven”), and his brother James the Just would assume the role of the Davidic priest-king.
Over time, if it were deemed advantageous, the new teaching of reincarnation would be introduced to the kingdom of Israel. Otherwise, it would remain a secret teaching amongst the elite.
According to the French writer Michel Tournier, a “diabol” is a symbol which has become autonomous, and taken on a life of its own. Like Frankenstein’s monster it attacks those who created it. As Tournier implies, those who live by symbols can die by them too. Christianity will die when its false doctrine of resurrection is finally destroyed.
Have another look at Leonardo da Vinci’s famous painting The Last Supper:
2) It is Mary Magdalene, wife of Jesus (let’s call it the Dan Brown theory).
3) It is the Beloved Disciple defined as a coded hybrid of Mary Magdalene and her brother Lazarus.
4) It is the young man into whom Jesus Christ reincarnated after his death. The idea that they are the same but different is coded in the fact that their clothing is identical, but where Jesus has red, the other has blue, and where Jesus has blue the other has red i.e. they complement each other perfectly. They make a single whole: two in one. Da Vinci is providing a visual representation that Jesus wasn’t resurrected at all, but reincarnated.
To which theory do you subscribe?
And what of the Davidic bloodline today? That’s where Supriem Rockefeller, the Thule Society and the Brotherhood of the Shadows come into the frame. We will elaborate on this in our next article next week.